Let's talk about a word we all agree is evil: SLAVERY.
What made it so evil? It wasn't just the forced labor. It was the LIE. The lie that an entire group of human beings weren't really “persons.” By calling them “property,” society justified the unthinkable. It was a loophole to deny them their most basic right: the right to exist.
Now, let's talk about the “equal rights” movement today. We're told it's about justice for everyone. But there's a giant, glaring hole in that logic. Democrats and liberal women's groups fight for rights for all humans... except for one specific group. The unborn. Why?
They use the exact same playbook as the slave owners of the past. They simply refuse to call them “persons.” They use a different word, “fetus”, to strip them of their humanity. By denying their personhood, they create a loophole to justify ending their life.
Don't believe me? Look at the law. In Indiana, a man was just charged with DOUBLE MURDER for killing his pregnant girlfriend and her unborn child. In another case, a man in Massachusetts was convicted of manslaughter for the death of an unborn child he caused. The law recognizes the unborn as a separate victim when someone ELSE kills them. But if a mother wants to end that same life, it's called “healthcare” and she faces no penalty.
How is that equal rights? It's not. It's a system where the value of an unborn life depends entirely on who is ending it. And here's the most twisted, hypocritical part of all. We see many of the same voices who passionately demand reparations for the historical evil of slavery, an evil built on denying Black people their personhood, turn around and use that exact same playbook to deny the personhood of the unborn. But the hypocrisy doesn't stop there.
These are the same people who scream for stricter gun laws, holding up the tragic photos of the less than 6,000 children who die from gun violence each year. They say we must do ANYTHING to save the children. Yet, they fight tooth and nail to protect abortion, which ends the lives of over 900,000 children in the womb every single year.
So let's get this straight: A child's life is sacred and worth fighting for if they are in a classroom, but disposable if they are in the womb? That's not a pro-child position. It's not a pro-life position. It's a politically convenient position that selectively values human life based on location. It's immoral and needs to stop.
Equal rights for all, equal punishment for all.